Image Loading Optimization
Client-side strategies for optimizing image delivery: lazy loading, responsive images, modern formats, and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) prevention. Covers browser mechanics, priority hints, and real-world implementation patterns.
Abstract
Image loading optimization balances three competing goals: fast LCP (load critical images early), bandwidth efficiency (defer non-critical images, serve optimal formats), and layout stability (prevent CLS by reserving space).
The browser’s resource scheduler prioritizes images based on viewport position and explicit hints (fetchpriority, loading). Native lazy loading defers off-screen images using browser-determined thresholds that vary by vendor and connection type—Chrome uses 1250-2500px, Firefox 600-800px, Safari ~100px. You cannot customize these thresholds.
Modern format delivery (<picture> with AVIF/WebP sources, or Accept-header content negotiation) reduces payload by 30-60% over JPEG. CLS prevention requires either explicit width/height attributes (browser calculates aspect ratio) or CSS aspect-ratio—both reserve space before image data arrives.
The highest-impact optimization: preload LCP images with fetchpriority="high", serve modern formats via CDN, and always specify dimensions.
The Challenge
Browser Constraints
Images compete for limited resources during page load:
| Resource | Budget | Image Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Network connections | 6 per origin (HTTP/1.1) | Large images block other requests |
| Main thread | 16ms per frame | Decode can block rendering |
| Memory | 50-500MB practical limit | Uncompressed bitmaps consume ~4 bytes/pixel |
| Bandwidth | Variable | Dominant payload on most pages |
Main thread blocking: Image decoding historically ran on the main thread. A 4K image (3840×2160) requires ~33MB uncompressed, blocking the thread for 50-200ms during decode. Modern browsers decode asynchronously by default, but decoding="sync" forces blocking behavior.
Competing Goals
| Goal | Strategy | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Fast LCP | Preload, high priority | Delays other resources |
| Bandwidth savings | Lazy load, modern formats | Slower off-screen discovery |
| Layout stability | Reserve space | Requires known dimensions |
| Device adaptation | Responsive images | Increased markup complexity |
Scale Factors
| Metric | Small Scale | Large Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Images per page | < 10 | > 100 |
| Total payload | < 500KB | > 5MB |
| Viewport coverage | Hero only | Infinite scroll |
| Format variants | 1 | 3-5 per image |
Design Paths
Path 1: Native Lazy Loading
How it works:
The loading="lazy" attribute defers image loading until the element approaches the viewport. The browser tracks scroll position and begins fetching when the image crosses a distance threshold.
<img src="photo.jpg" loading="lazy" width="640" height="480" alt="Description" />Browser thresholds (distance from viewport):
| Browser | Fast connection (4G+) | Slow connection (3G) |
|---|---|---|
| Chrome/Edge | 1250px | 2500px |
| Firefox | 600-800px | 600-800px |
| Safari | ~100px | ~100px |
These thresholds are hardcoded—you cannot customize them via JavaScript or CSS. Chrome adjusts based on the reported connection type; Firefox and Safari use fixed values.
Critical requirement: Always include width and height attributes. Without dimensions:
- Browser cannot reserve space → CLS occurs
- Browser may assume image fits in viewport → loads immediately regardless of
loading="lazy"
Edge cases:
- Print stylesheets: Lazy images may not load when printing; consider
@media print { img { loading: eager; } }workaround (requires JavaScript to toggle) - Search engines: Googlebot executes JavaScript and triggers lazy loading, but some crawlers don’t wait—test with Google Search Console
display: noneimages: Browsers may still load them;loading="lazy"behavior is inconsistent here- Dynamic insertion: Images added via JavaScript after DOMContentLoaded are evaluated against current scroll position
Browser support: Chrome 77+ (2019), Firefox 75+ (2020), Safari 15.4+ (2022). ~95%+ global coverage. Unsupported browsers ignore the attribute and load immediately.
Best for:
- Below-the-fold images
- Long-form content with many images
- Infinite scroll implementations
Not for:
- LCP candidates (hero images, above-the-fold content)
- Images that must be visible immediately
Path 2: Intersection Observer (Custom Lazy Loading)
How it works:
JavaScript-based lazy loading using Intersection Observer API for fine-grained control over loading thresholds and behavior.
3 collapsed lines
// Track which images have been loadedconst loadedImages = new WeakSet<HTMLImageElement>()
function lazyLoadImages(options: IntersectionObserverInit = {}) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver( (entries) => { entries.forEach((entry) => { if (entry.isIntersecting) { const img = entry.target as HTMLImageElement const src = img.dataset.src if (src && !loadedImages.has(img)) { img.src = src loadedImages.add(img) observer.unobserve(img) } } }) }, { rootMargin: "200px 0px", // Start loading 200px before viewport threshold: 0.01, // Trigger when 1% visible ...options, }, )
document.querySelectorAll("img[data-src]").forEach((img) => { observer.observe(img) })
return observer}Customizable parameters:
| Parameter | Native | Intersection Observer |
|---|---|---|
| Distance threshold | Fixed per browser | rootMargin (any value) |
| Visibility trigger | Browser-determined | threshold (0-1) |
| Root element | Viewport only | Any scrollable container |
| Connection awareness | Chrome only | Manual implementation |
When to use over native:
- Need consistent cross-browser threshold
- Lazy loading within a scrollable container (not viewport)
- Complex loading sequences (e.g., prioritize images in current scroll direction)
- Fallback for browsers without native support (increasingly rare)
Trade-offs:
- ✅ Full control over loading behavior
- ✅ Consistent thresholds across browsers
- ✅ Works with any scrollable container
- ❌ Requires JavaScript
- ❌ More code to maintain
- ❌ Slightly higher initial payload
Path 3: Responsive Images with srcset/sizes
How it works:
Browser selects optimal image variant based on viewport width and device pixel ratio. Two approaches: resolution switching and art direction.
Resolution switching (same image, different sizes):
<img srcset="photo-320w.jpg 320w, photo-640w.jpg 640w, photo-1280w.jpg 1280w, photo-1920w.jpg 1920w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, (max-width: 1200px) 50vw, 33vw" src="photo-1280w.jpg" alt="Description" width="1920" height="1080"/>How sizes works:
The sizes attribute tells the browser the rendered width at each breakpoint:
- Browser reads
sizesbefore layout completes - Matches current viewport against media conditions
- Calculates effective pixel width (e.g.,
50vwon 1200px viewport = 600px) - Multiplies by device pixel ratio (e.g., 600px × 2 = 1200px for 2x display)
- Selects smallest
srcsetcandidate ≥ calculated width
Why sizes is required with width descriptors: Without sizes, the browser doesn’t know the rendered width and defaults to 100vw, often selecting larger-than-necessary images.
Art direction (different images for different contexts):
<picture> <source media="(min-width: 1200px)" srcset="hero-landscape.jpg" /> <source media="(min-width: 600px)" srcset="hero-square.jpg" /> <img src="hero-portrait.jpg" alt="Product showcase" width="400" height="600" /></picture>Use <picture> with media queries when you need different compositions—cropped versions, different aspect ratios, or entirely different images for mobile vs desktop.
Decision matrix:
| Scenario | Use |
|---|---|
| Same image, different resolutions | srcset with width descriptors |
| Same image, different pixel densities | srcset with 1x/2x descriptors |
| Different compositions per breakpoint | <picture> with media |
| Different formats (WebP, AVIF) | <picture> with type |
Path 4: Modern Format Delivery
Format characteristics:
| Format | Compression vs JPEG | Browser Support | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVIF | 50-60% smaller | Chrome 85+, Firefox 93+, Safari 16.4+ | Photos, complex images |
| WebP | 25-35% smaller | Chrome 23+, Firefox 65+, Safari 14.1+ | Broad compatibility |
| JPEG XL | 30-60% smaller | Safari 17+, Chrome behind flag | Future consideration |
| JPEG | Baseline | Universal | Fallback |
Approach 1: <picture> with type attribute (recommended)
<picture> <source srcset="photo.avif" type="image/avif" /> <source srcset="photo.webp" type="image/webp" /> <img src="photo.jpg" alt="Description" width="800" height="600" /></picture>Browser evaluates sources top-to-bottom, selecting first supported type. Order matters—put smallest format first.
Approach 2: Content negotiation via Accept header
Server inspects Accept header and serves appropriate format:
# Chrome sends:Accept: image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,image/*,*/*;q=0.8
# Server responds with Content-Type based on AcceptCritical: Set Vary: Accept header so CDNs cache format-specific responses correctly.
| Approach | Control | Complexity | CDN Compatibility |
|---|---|---|---|
<picture> | Client-side | Markup per image | Universal |
| Accept negotiation | Server-side | Server/CDN config | Requires Vary header |
Why <picture> is preferred:
- No server configuration required
- Works with static hosting
- Explicit control over format priority
- CDN caches each URL separately (no Vary complexity)
Path 5: Priority Hints
How it works:
The fetchpriority attribute influences the browser’s resource scheduler. Combined with loading, it controls both timing and priority.
<!-- LCP image: load immediately with high priority --><img src="hero.jpg" fetchpriority="high" width="1920" height="1080" alt="Hero" />
<!-- Decorative: defer and deprioritize --><img src="decoration.jpg" loading="lazy" fetchpriority="low" alt="" />Priority matrix:
loading | fetchpriority | Behavior |
|---|---|---|
| eager (default) | high | Immediate, high priority |
| eager | low | Immediate, low priority |
| lazy | high | Deferred until near viewport, then high priority |
| lazy | low | Deferred, low priority |
Preload for LCP images:
<head> <link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero.jpg" fetchpriority="high" /></head>Preload hints start the request before the browser discovers the <img> element. Critical for images referenced in CSS or discovered late in HTML parsing.
Preload with responsive images:
<link rel="preload" as="image" href="hero.jpg" imagesrcset="hero-400.jpg 400w, hero-800.jpg 800w, hero-1200.jpg 1200w" imagesizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 50vw"/>When to use fetchpriority="high":
- LCP candidate images
- Above-the-fold hero images
- Critical product images
When to use fetchpriority="low":
- Footer images
- Decorative backgrounds
- Below-the-fold thumbnails
CLS Prevention
Layout shift occurs when content moves after initial paint. Images without dimensions are the primary cause of image-related CLS.
Mechanism
When the browser encounters an image:
- Without dimensions: Renders placeholder (0×0 or replaced element default), then reflows when image loads
- With dimensions: Calculates aspect ratio from
width/height, reserves space immediately
Solution 1: width and height Attributes
<img src="photo.jpg" width="800" height="600" alt="Description" />Browser calculates intrinsic aspect ratio: 800÷600 = 1.33. With CSS width: 100%, the height scales proportionally.
How modern browsers handle this:
Since 2019, browsers use width and height to compute a default aspect ratio in the UA stylesheet:
/* Browser's internal stylesheet */img { aspect-ratio: attr(width) / attr(height);}This means width="800" height="600" automatically reserves space even with responsive CSS.
Solution 2: CSS aspect-ratio
.responsive-image { width: 100%; height: auto; aspect-ratio: 16 / 9;}Use when:
- Image dimensions aren’t known at markup time
- Dynamic images from APIs without dimension metadata
- Consistent aspect ratio across a gallery
Browser support: Chrome 88+, Firefox 89+, Safari 15+.
Solution 3: Padding-bottom Hack (Legacy)
<div style="position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0;"> <img src="photo.jpg" style="position: absolute; width: 100%; height: 100%;" alt="Description" /></div>The padding percentage is relative to container width, creating a fixed aspect ratio (56.25% = 9÷16 = 16:9).
Avoid this approach unless supporting browsers without aspect-ratio support.
CLS Measurement
new PerformanceObserver((list) => { for (const entry of list.getEntries()) { if (!entry.hadRecentInput) { console.log("CLS contribution:", entry.value, entry.sources) } }}).observe({ type: "layout-shift", buffered: true })Target: CLS < 0.1 for “good” Core Web Vitals score.
Placeholder Strategies
Placeholders improve perceived performance by providing visual feedback while images load.
Dominant Color
Extract the dominant color and display as background:
<img src="photo.jpg" style="background-color: #d4a574;" alt="Description" width="800" height="600" />Implementation:
- Server-side: Extract during upload with ImageMagick, Sharp, or similar
- Build-time: Generate with image processing plugins
- Runtime: Embed in API response
Trade-offs:
- ✅ Minimal overhead (6-7 bytes for hex color)
- ✅ No JavaScript required
- ❌ No visual detail
LQIP (Low Quality Image Placeholder)
Inline a tiny blurred version:
<img src="photo.jpg" style="background-image: url('...');" alt="Description" width="800" height="600"/>Sizing guidelines:
- 20-40 pixels wide, heavily compressed
- ~200-500 bytes base64 encoded
- Apply CSS blur to smooth pixelation
BlurHash
Compact representation (~20-30 bytes) that decodes to a gradient:
5 collapsed lines
import { decode } from "blurhash"
// Server provides hash during SSR or in API responseconst hash = "LEHV6nWB2yk8pyo0adR*.7kCMdnj"
// Decode to pixelsconst pixels = decode(hash, 32, 32)
// Render to canvas or use as CSS backgroundconst canvas = document.createElement("canvas")canvas.width = 32canvas.height = 32const ctx = canvas.getContext("2d")const imageData = ctx.createImageData(32, 32)6 collapsed lines
imageData.data.set(pixels)ctx.putImageData(imageData, 0, 0)
// Apply as backgroundimg.style.backgroundImage = `url(${canvas.toDataURL()})`img.style.backgroundSize = "cover"Trade-offs:
- ✅ Excellent compression (~20-30 bytes)
- ✅ Pleasing gradient approximation
- ❌ Requires JavaScript to decode
- ❌ Computation cost (~1-2ms per decode)
Skeleton Placeholder
CSS-only placeholder matching expected dimensions:
.image-skeleton { background: linear-gradient(90deg, var(--skeleton-base) 25%, var(--skeleton-highlight) 50%, var(--skeleton-base) 75%); background-size: 200% 100%; animation: shimmer 1.5s infinite;}
@keyframes shimmer { 0% { background-position: 200% 0; } 100% { background-position: -200% 0; }}Best for:
- Consistent layouts (cards, grids)
- When dominant color/LQIP unavailable
- Framework integration (many UI libraries provide skeleton components)
Comparison
| Strategy | Payload | JavaScript Required | Visual Fidelity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dominant color | 6-7 bytes | No | Low |
| LQIP | 200-500 bytes | No | Medium |
| BlurHash | 20-30 bytes | Yes | Medium |
| Skeleton | 0 (CSS) | No | None (structural) |
Image CDN Integration
Image CDNs optimize and deliver images on-the-fly, eliminating the need to pre-generate variants.
Core Capabilities
| Feature | Benefit |
|---|---|
| On-demand resizing | Generate any dimension from source |
| Format conversion | Serve WebP/AVIF automatically |
| Quality optimization | Compress based on content type |
| Global caching | Low latency delivery |
| URL-based transforms | No build step required |
URL Pattern Example
https://cdn.example.com/images/photo.jpg?w=800&h=600&f=webp&q=75| Parameter | Purpose |
|---|---|
w | Width |
h | Height |
f | Format (webp, avif, auto) |
q | Quality (1-100) |
Integration with Responsive Images
<img srcset=" https://cdn.example.com/photo.jpg?w=400 400w, https://cdn.example.com/photo.jpg?w=800 800w, https://cdn.example.com/photo.jpg?w=1200 1200w " sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 50vw" src="https://cdn.example.com/photo.jpg?w=800" alt="Description" width="1200" height="800"/>Auto-format negotiation: Many CDNs support f=auto, inspecting the Accept header to serve optimal format:
<!-- CDN serves AVIF, WebP, or JPEG based on Accept header --><img src="https://cdn.example.com/photo.jpg?f=auto&q=75" alt="Description" />Cache Strategy
| Header | Recommended Value | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
Cache-Control | public, max-age=31536000 | Long cache (images rarely change) |
Vary | Accept (if format negotiation) | Cache per format |
ETag | Hash of source + transforms | Cache invalidation |
Cache invalidation approaches:
- Content hash in filename:
photo-a1b2c3.jpg - Version query param:
photo.jpg?v=2 - Purge API (CDN-specific)
Major CDN Providers
| Provider | Strengths |
|---|---|
| Cloudinary | Rich transformation API, ML-based optimization |
| Imgix | Performance focus, responsive images |
| Cloudflare Images | Integrated with Cloudflare CDN |
| Fastly Image Optimizer | Edge compute, custom logic |
| Vercel/Next.js Image | Framework integration |
Real-World Implementations
Instagram: Aggressive Compression
Challenge: Billions of images, mobile-first users on varying connections.
Approach:
- Compress all uploads regardless of source quality
- Multiple size variants: 150×150 (thumbnail), 320×320, 480×480, 640×640, 1080×1080
- Progressive JPEG for gradual loading
- Dominant color placeholders
Key insight: Instagram accepts quality loss for smaller payloads. Users tolerate compression artifacts on mobile; the speed gain outweighs visual fidelity.
Result: Sub-second image loads on 3G connections.
Pinterest: Vertical Scroll Optimization
Challenge: Infinite scroll masonry grid with variable-height images.
Approach:
- Preferred 2:3 aspect ratio (vertical orientation suits scroll direction)
- Height estimation for unseen images (prevents scroll position jumps)
- Aggressive lazy loading with large threshold
- BlurHash placeholders for visual continuity
Key insight: Consistent aspect ratio simplifies layout calculations and reduces CLS in masonry grids.
Unsplash: High-Resolution Source, Multiple Delivery Sizes
Challenge: Photographers upload 20-50MB originals; pages need optimized delivery.
Approach:
- Store original at full resolution
- On-demand CDN transformation for any requested size
- Prominent download options (small/medium/large/original)
- LQIP with blur for preview
Integration pattern for third-party use:
<img srcset=" https://images.unsplash.com/photo-xxx?w=400 400w, https://images.unsplash.com/photo-xxx?w=800 800w, https://images.unsplash.com/photo-xxx?w=1200 1200w " sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 50vw" src="https://images.unsplash.com/photo-xxx?w=800" alt="Description"/>Figma: Canvas Rendering (Non-DOM)
Challenge: Design files with 100K+ objects, real-time collaboration.
Approach:
- WebGL rendering (bypasses DOM entirely)
- Spatial indexing (R-tree) for visible object query
- Level-of-detail: simplify distant objects
- Incremental rendering prioritizing viewport center
Key insight: At extreme scale, DOM-based image handling becomes the bottleneck. WebGL provides full control over what renders.
Performance Optimization
LCP Optimization Checklist
- Identify LCP element: Use DevTools Performance panel or web-vitals library
- Preload if image:
<link rel="preload" as="image" href="..." fetchpriority="high"> - Remove lazy loading: Never
loading="lazy"on LCP candidates - Optimize format/size: Serve smallest sufficient variant
- Minimize request chain: Avoid CSS background-image (discovered late)
Monitoring
2 collapsed lines
import { onLCP, onCLS, onINP } from "web-vitals"
onLCP((metric) => { const entry = metric.entries[metric.entries.length - 1] if (entry.element?.tagName === "IMG") { console.log("LCP image:", entry.element.src) console.log("LCP time:", metric.value) // Report to analytics }})
3 collapsed lines
onCLS((metric) => { console.log("CLS:", metric.value)})Image Size Budget
| Viewport | Target Total Images | Per-Image Target (LCP) |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile (360px) | < 500KB | < 100KB |
| Tablet (768px) | < 1MB | < 200KB |
| Desktop (1920px) | < 2MB | < 400KB |
These are guidelines—actual budgets depend on page type and user expectations.
Browser Constraints
Decoding Attribute
Controls synchronous vs asynchronous image decoding:
<img src="photo.jpg" decoding="async" alt="Description" />| Value | Behavior | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
async | Non-blocking decode | Default for most images |
sync | Blocking decode | Rarely needed |
auto | Browser decides | Default behavior |
Modern browsers default to async decoding for off-main-thread performance. Explicit decoding="async" ensures this behavior.
Memory Considerations
| Image Dimensions | Uncompressed Memory | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 640×480 (VGA) | ~1.2MB | Negligible |
| 1920×1080 (FHD) | ~8MB | Moderate |
| 3840×2160 (4K) | ~33MB | Significant |
| 8192×8192 | ~268MB | Can crash mobile |
Mitigation:
- Serve appropriately-sized images (never 4K to mobile)
- Lazy load to avoid simultaneous decode
- Release references to allow garbage collection
Connection-Aware Loading
const connection = navigator.connection
function getImageQuality(): "high" | "medium" | "low" { if (!connection) return "medium"
if (connection.saveData) return "low" if (connection.effectiveType === "4g") return "high" if (connection.effectiveType === "3g") return "medium" return "low"}Caveats:
navigator.connectionis not available in SafarieffectiveTypecan be inaccurate- Consider this a hint, not a guarantee
Accessibility
Alt Text Requirements
<!-- Informative image: describe content --><img src="chart.png" alt="Q4 revenue increased 23% to $4.2M" />
<!-- Decorative image: empty alt --><img src="divider.png" alt="" />
<!-- Complex image: detailed description --><img src="architecture.png" alt="System architecture diagram" aria-describedby="arch-details" /><p id="arch-details">The system consists of three layers...</p>Reduced Motion
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) { .image-transition { transition: none; }
.skeleton-loader { animation: none; background: var(--skeleton-base); }}High Contrast Mode
Ensure placeholder backgrounds don’t disappear:
@media (forced-colors: active) { .image-placeholder { forced-color-adjust: none; background-color: Canvas; border: 1px solid CanvasText; }}Conclusion
Image optimization is the highest-impact intervention for Core Web Vitals. The browser provides powerful primitives—native lazy loading, priority hints, responsive images, and format negotiation—but requires correct usage.
Priorities by impact:
- Always specify dimensions:
width/heightor CSSaspect-ratioeliminate CLS - Preload LCP images:
<link rel="preload">withfetchpriority="high" - Serve modern formats: AVIF/WebP via
<picture>or CDN - Lazy load below-fold: Native
loading="lazy"for simplicity - Right-size images: Responsive
srcset/sizesfor device-appropriate delivery
Appendix
Prerequisites
- HTML image element semantics
- CSS layout fundamentals
- HTTP caching basics
- Core Web Vitals metrics (LCP, CLS, INP)
Summary
- Native lazy loading (
loading="lazy") defers off-screen images with browser-determined thresholds; always includewidth/height - Responsive images (
srcset/sizes) let browsers select optimal variants; use<picture>for art direction or format switching - Modern formats (AVIF, WebP) reduce payload 30-60% over JPEG; serve via
<picture>type attribute or CDN auto-negotiation - CLS prevention requires explicit dimensions or CSS
aspect-ratio—browsers calculate intrinsic ratio fromwidth/heightattributes - Priority hints (
fetchpriority, preload) control resource scheduling; usehighfor LCP images,lowfor decorative - Image CDNs provide on-demand transformation, eliminating pre-generation of size/format variants
References
- WHATWG HTML Living Standard - Images - Authoritative spec for
loading,decoding,srcset,sizes - WHATWG HTML Living Standard - fetchpriority - Priority hints specification
- CSS Images Module Level 4 -
aspect-ratioand image-set specifications - MDN - Responsive Images - Comprehensive guide
- web.dev - Browser-Level Image Lazy Loading - Chrome team implementation details
- web.dev - Optimize LCP - LCP optimization strategies
- web.dev - Optimize CLS - CLS prevention techniques
- Addy Osmani - Native Image Lazy Loading - In-depth analysis from Chrome team
- BlurHash - Placeholder algorithm specification
- Cloudinary - LQIP Explained - Placeholder implementation guide
Read more
-
Previous
Rendering Strategies
System Design / Frontend System Design 18 min readChoosing between CSR, SSR, SSG, and hybrid rendering is not a binary decision—it’s about matching rendering strategy to content characteristics. Static content benefits from build-time rendering; dynamic, personalized content needs request-time rendering; interactive components need client-side JavaScript. Modern frameworks like Next.js 15, Astro 5, and Nuxt 3 enable mixing strategies within a single application, rendering each route—or even each component—with the optimal approach.
-
Next
Client Performance Monitoring
System Design / Frontend System Design 18 min readMeasuring frontend performance in production requires capturing real user experience data—not just synthetic benchmarks. Lab tools like Lighthouse measure performance under controlled conditions, but users experience your application on varied devices, networks, and contexts. Real User Monitoring (RUM) bridges this gap by collecting performance metrics from actual browser sessions, enabling data-driven optimization where it matters most: in the field.